Skip to main content You are either not logged in or not registered with our community. Click here to register.

WikiFullscreen ChatVoice Chat (Discord)Org PageF.A.Q.

Topic: Issues with a antioperation (Read 1134 times) previous topic - next topic

Issues with a antioperation
had the luck of seeing this on RSI forums:
https://forums.robertsspaceindustries.com/discussion/65425/operation-pvp-pitchfork-help-defend-the-poor-peace-loving-vanduul-operation-trident
So we certainly need to cover up our main thrusters against them

  • IllOmen
  • [*][*][*]
  • Enrolled
Re: Issues with a antioperation
Reply #1
I wouldn't be too concerned about that one, the OP already confirmed it was a joke. :P

  • JayHawk
  • [*][*][*]
  • Enrolled
Re: Issues with a antioperation
Reply #2
I found it more amusing than anything.

With any game, there will always be people who want to "run against the grain". Even if some are serious about ruining this operation, I'd take it with a pinch of salt.

  • Ryuto
  • [*][*][*]
  • Enrolled
Re: Issues with a antioperation
Reply #3
I agree with this. It's best we focus on the Vanduul as opposed to the small group of people who want to grief things.

Re: Issues with a antioperation
Reply #4
Our strategy should be designed to be robust against griefing. For amusement purposes we can refer to the need for this as operation Trident - but I don't believe it will be an issue.